St john s grid-scale energy storage

How can U.S. transmission grids and wholesale energy markets adapt to the gigawatts of energy storage coming online over the next decade?In the near future, the scale of the batteries serving U.S. power grids is set to explode, increasing fromabout 1.5 gigawatts todayto tens or hundreds of gigawatts
Contact online >>

How can U.S. transmission grids and wholesale energy markets adapt to the gigawatts of energy storage coming online over the next decade?

In the near future, the scale of the batteries serving U.S. power grids is set to explode, increasing fromabout 1.5 gigawatts todayto tens or hundreds of gigawatts by 2030. These batteries will play a vital role in shifting intermittent wind and solar power from when it’s produced to when it’s needed and serving broader grid services needs on an increasingly decarbonizing grid.

But as a resource that can both absorb and discharge energy at a moment’s notice, batteries are verydifferent from both dispatchable generatorsand intermittent wind and solar farms. That requiresnewtechnical and economic systems for managing and valuing them — and the grid operatorsthat run wholesale electricity markets serving about two-thirds of the countryare struggling to make those changes to keep up with the pace of growth.

That’s one of the key takeaways from last week’s Energy Storage Associationpolicy forum, where representatives of the country’sregional transmission organizations (RTOs) and independent system operators (ISOs) joined storage industry groups and regulators to describe their work on energy storage integration.

Richard Glick, thenewly named chairof the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, which regulates ISOs and RTOs, noted that storage is one of several new technologies facing barriers to full market participation that FERC is trying to eliminate.

“I think the commission has done a pretty good job on that over the past half-decade or so,” the Democrat said.FERC Order 841has led to major new opportunities for energy storage to participate in wholesale energy, capacity and ancillary services markets, albeit at different paces and in different ways across ISOs and RTOs.FERC Order 2222sets a similar path for distributed energy resources, including aggregated batteries.

At the same time, “renewable energy generators see storage as a very important partner,” he said, as wind and solar projects add batteries to firm and shift their power output to meet grid demands. These hybridresources now make up about two-thirds of all solar projects in the interconnection queue of California grid operator CAISOand constitutea rising share of clean energy projects across other markets. DevelopersincludingEDF Renewables,Enel,NextEra Energy, LS Powerand many others are increasingly combining renewables and batteries in multiple states.

Gregory Cook, California ISO’s executive director of market and infrastructure, highlighted the work underway to integrate these novel combinations into its interconnection and market structures. CAISO expects its roughly 550 megawatts of energy storage will rise to 1,750 MW by this summerand to 3,300 MW in the next few years.

California’s rolling blackouts last August has led state regulators to push toaccelerate battery deployments, and“much of that new storage is going to be in the form of hybrid resources, where we’re seeing storage added to existing solar sites.” Beyond allowing multiple resources to connect at a single point, pairing batteries with solar allows them to access federal tax creditsthat are, as yet, unavailable to standalone storage.

Other ISOs are seeing similar patterns, if at lower volumes. Manu Asthana, CEO of mid-Atlantic grid operator PJM, noted that of the 145 gigawatts of generation in its interconnection queue, 92 percent issolar, wind, batteries or hybrid resources. That includes about 15 GW of standalone storage and another 18 GW of hybrid storage.

Renuka Chatterjee, executive director of system operations for theMidcontinent Independent System Operator, reported about4 GW of standalone storage and 5 GW of hybrid resources, much of it linked to solar. Bruce Rew, senior vice president of operations for the Southwest Power Pool, cited about 6 GWof hybrid storage and 3 GWof standalone batteries.

But renewable and storage developers are running into problems with how grid operators’ interconnection and market rules manage hybrids.FERC’stechnical conference on hybrid resourceslast summer raised “significant and substantial concerns,” he said, adding,“we’re going to take a serious and...long look at the responses we received.”

The root of these problems,according to a2019 paperfromGrid Strategies’Rob Gramlich and Michael Gogginand Energy Storage Association interim CEO Jason Burwen, “is that present market rules will represent them as deviations from existing resource types.”

That approach ends up shoehorning hybrids into market rules that treat them as a “variable generator,” or in other words, a solar and wind farm “that is also dispatchable, or as a storage resource that has onsite fuel.” Either choice ends up misapplying interconnection and market concepts that would better be managed by creating a separate hybrid category to deal with them, they argue.

For example,some ISOs and RTOs require renewable projects seeking to add batteries to resubmit interconnection applications, which can push them behind inalready long and difficult-to-navigateinterconnection queues.

Others may presume that renewables and storage will simultaneously inject power at levels that would cause reliability problems at their interconnection site, even though project operators would have no economic incentive to do that and could easily control their systems to avoid it.

On the market disconnect front, hybrids and standalone storage systems can be subjected to rules that require them to submit to grid operator dispatches that may limit their ability to optimize their economic value. Examples include rules that force batteries to retain minimum states of charge, which are meant to assure they’ll be available at full capacity when dispatchedbut which developers say constrain their freedom to optimize their storage capacity.

ISOs are taking steps to resolve these disconnects. CAISO allows solar projects adding batteries tosubmit a “material modification” rather than resubmitting projects to its queue. ItsHybrid Resources Initiativeis developing state-of-charge parameters that offer more flexibility, as well as an option for projects to manage the combined dispatch of renewables and storage, both expected to be finalized later this year, Cook said.

The Midcontinent Independent System Operator is developing a similar Surplus Interconnection Serviceto ease adding batteries to wind and solar projects, Chatterjee said. And New York state grid operator NYISO has developedrules for energy storageto participate in both wholesale energy markets and to provide services to utilities as part of its August implementation of Order 841, according toMichael DeSocio, director of market design.

“Market power mitigation” rules, designed to prevent power plant owners from using their relatively high concentration of resources in an ISO''s footprintto act in ways that shift prices in uncompetitive ways, can also be improperly applied to batteries that make up a fraction of today’s markets, developers argue.

These complications have been compounded by several orders passed by FERC’s Republican majority under the Trump administration that have applied these market mitigation structures on state-subsidized resources, including batteries, in ways that have limited their ability to compete in capacity markets inPJM’s 13-state territoryand in downstate sections ofNYISO’s grid.

Glick, who voted against these decisions, repeated his previously stated view that they are likely to be overturned by legal challenges. But he also noted that ISO and RTO stakeholders are working on market reform proposals that will need to account not just for resolving conflicts between state and federal jurisdiction over energy policybut also for finding ways to accommodate the shifting mix of resources that supply them.

About St john s grid-scale energy storage

About St john s grid-scale energy storage

As the photovoltaic (PV) industry continues to evolve, advancements in St john s grid-scale energy storage have become critical to optimizing the utilization of renewable energy sources. From innovative battery technologies to intelligent energy management systems, these solutions are transforming the way we store and distribute solar-generated electricity.

When you're looking for the latest and most efficient St john s grid-scale energy storage for your PV project, our website offers a comprehensive selection of cutting-edge products designed to meet your specific requirements. Whether you're a renewable energy developer, utility company, or commercial enterprise looking to reduce your carbon footprint, we have the solutions to help you harness the full potential of solar energy.

By interacting with our online customer service, you'll gain a deep understanding of the various St john s grid-scale energy storage featured in our extensive catalog, such as high-efficiency storage batteries and intelligent energy management systems, and how they work together to provide a stable and reliable power supply for your PV projects.

Related Contents

Contact Integrated Localized Bess Provider

Enter your inquiry details, We will reply you in 24 hours.